The semiconductor industry stands at a pivotal crossroads, particularly with discussions regarding potential collaborations and acquisitions making headlinesOne such narrative involves Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) and Intel, two giants in the silicon fabrication landscapeRecent reports have surfaced speculating about TSMC potentially taking over or forming a joint venture with Intel's wafer fabrication plantsHowever, the reality of this scenario is more complex than mere speculation suggests.

Reports from Reuters have indicated that the U.S. government may not be supportive of allowing foreign entities, such as TSMC, to operate Intel’s manufacturing facilities located within the United StatesThis raises questions about not only the feasibility of such a partnership but also the regulatory landscape that governs the semiconductor supply chainAnalysts from major financial institutions, including JPMorgan Chase and Morgan Stanley, have weighed in on this topic, offering insights into the likelihood of TSMC acquiring or operating Intel's fabrication sites, suggesting that the chances are relatively low.

From JPMorgan's perspective, for TSMC to pursue this path, it would require significant concessions and agreements from a multitude of stakeholders, including government agencies, shareholders, and customersTSMC's leadership has consistently articulated that acquiring or running external wafer fabs is not their primary strategic focus, primarily due to vast differences in factory layouts, cost structures, and organizational culturesThis underpins JPMorgan's assertion that unless the U.S. government provides substantial financial incentives and clarifies TSMC’s operational role, the probability of such a venture remains dim.

Additionally, there are notions from various media suggesting that TSMC might consider sharing advanced process technologies, such as the N3 and N2 fabrication nodes, with Intel or even dispatching engineers to assist Intel in enhancing its manufacturing capabilities

Advertisements

However, these scenarios have been characterized by JPMorgan as overly idealistic and virtually impossibleTSMC places a premium on intellectual property protection, showcasing a strong disinclination to expose its groundbreaking technologies to competitors, even in a collaborative settingThus, it's likely that TSMC would firmly oppose any requests to share its trade secrets.

Intel's wafer foundry business is forecasted to face a staggering loss of $7 billion in 2024. If TSMC were to assume control of Intel’s factories or establish a joint venture, the immediate effect on financial statements could be negative, generating a pessimistic market responseTSMC's management resources would also be stretched thin, given the operational models at Intel’s fabs differ significantly from TSMC’s existing structuresThis operational hurdle adds another layer of complexity to the potential collaboration.

From a valuation standpoint, such a move could elevate TSMC's market stature, reinforcing its position as the singular company capable of large-scale advanced process manufacturing globallyWhile the short-term repercussions may hinder earnings per share, the long-term benefits could very well drive a reevaluation of the company’s price-to-earnings ratioJPMorgan predicts that Intel might become a major customer for TSMC over the next three to five years, as the immediate objective for Intel is to regain market share and revenue, rather than independently enhancing its foundry capacity.

On the contrary, Morgan Stanley contends that TSMC has made it explicitly clear that it has no interest in acquiring Intel’s wafer fabrication plantsWith years of committed research and development investment under its belt, TSMC has established a competitive edge in the foundry sector, dominating the advanced technology marketMorgan Stanley further posits that TSMC's decisions regarding expansion of semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S. hinge primarily on customer demand and shareholder value, rather than altruistically assisting their U.S. rival, Intel.

Interesting to note is that the most significant recent management meeting involving TSMC was a board meeting held in the United States on February 12, where no commentary was provided regarding tariffs or geopolitical issues

Advertisements

In future earnings call conferences, similar inquiries were posed to TSMC’s leadership about their expansion strategies in the U.S. market, specifically regarding possible joint ventures akin to their partnerships in Japan and EuropeTSMC has reaffirmed its commitment to its existing strategy of U.S. fab expansion while expressing no intentions of engaging in joint ventures.

TSMC’s partnerships in regions like Japan and Europe – for instance, with companies such as Sony and Bosch – are primarily aimed at securing orders for mature processes, aligning with TSMC's strategic focusMeanwhile, TSMC's fabs in the U.S. are geared towards advanced processes like 4nm and 3nm, markets where TSMC already possesses technological advantagesTherefore, the value added by a joint venture in the U.S. appears minimal.

In the earnings call in October 2024, Morgan Stanley questioned TSMC's management about interest in acquiring a portion of Intel's U.S. fabsTSMC's response reiterated its lack of interest in such acquisitions, recognizing Intel as a vertically integrated equipment manufacturer and a significant customer whose business prospects could still be substantial in the futureFurthermore, TSMC has indicated its ability to maintain growth in the CPU foundry market through contracts with companies like AMD and those utilizing ARM architectureThe complexities involved in adjusting fabrication processes from other foundries to TSMC’s standards present both financial and operational hurdles that TSMC is unlikely to pursue.

In summary, the landscape of semiconductor manufacturing is influenced by a multitude of factors – from regulatory challenges and corporate strategies to market dynamics and technological advancementsThe dialogue surrounding potential TSMC and Intel collaborations underscores the intricacies of this ever-evolving industry where strategic decisions are not merely about economic motivations but are deeply interwoven with broader geopolitical considerations.

Advertisements

Advertisements

Advertisements